Is the Beam Center Correct?

10 February 2010

We have had a couple of instances when the beam center was incorrect in the header of our images. The header of an image is written out when you collect a diffraction image. The header may contain the wavelength, collection time, beam center and oscillation step size, which are read by data processing software (in this case Ipmosflm).

Unfortunately, the information contained within the header may not be correct.
How can you look for to tell if your beam center is incorrect?

One way is by looking at where the Bragg reflections are predicted vs. where they actually are located. It is important to check if the orientation of the lunes and the spacing between Bragg reflections looks reasonable. If they are not then you may an issue with your unit cell and/or space group and not a beam center problem.



If you are having trouble seeing the offset in the video here is a screen shot:
beam_center_off
The blue arrow is pointing toward the Bragg reflections while the red arrow indicates the predicted reflection locations. Also you can see that there are fewer Bragg reflections (dark spots) than what is predicted (yellow squares) which is a sign that there is a problem.

    CNS: Simulated Annealing

    8 February 2010

    CNS (Crystallography and NMR systems) is able to perform simulated annealing to get started, one must first create a generate file.

    1) Input then scroll down to Refinement, refine.inp and Edit
    cns_refine_input
    2) amy.pdb needs to be replaced with your pdb file
    cns_refine_input
    3) The space group, unit cell, angles and amy.cv need to be updated
    cns_composite_omit_map
    4) Adjust the resolution to your desired range. The overall B-factor correction should be set to isotropic unless you are dealing with very high resolution data (~1 Angstrom). Set Bulk solvent correction needs to be set to False
    cns_composite_omit_map
    5) Change annealing schedule to slowcool
    cns_composite_omit_map
    Note: Not shown, but I usually set the map grid to 0.25 for better viewing
    Save an updated file

    In your terminal:
    type: cns < refine.inp > refine.out &
    Note: if you renamed your generate files then use them as your .inp
    The ‘&’ symbol allows your cursor to be free

    type: tail -f refine.out
    This will allow to see the progress of the processing in your terminal
    This allows you to quickly see if the inputs have generate an error

      CNS (Crystallography and NMR systems) is able to generate a composite omit map. In getting started, one must first create a generate file.

      1) Input then scroll down to Refinement, composite_omit_map.inp and Edit
      cns_composite_omit_map
      2) Three ‘amy’ files need to be placed with your appropriate files
      The space group, unit cell and angles also need to be updated (I find this slightly annoying since the information is contained in the files you are submitting)
      cns_composite_omit_map
      3) Bulk solvent correction needs to be set to False
      cns_composite_omit_map
      4) I suggest putting the map grid at 0.25, raising the starting temp to 1500 and 50 K steps. I have come across those that adjust the random number generator, but haven’t noticed a huge difference.
      cns_composite_omit_map
      Save an updated file

      In your terminal:
      type: cns < composite_omit_map.inp > composite_omit_map.out &
      Note: if you renamed your generate files then use them as your .inp
      The ‘&’ symbol allows your cursor to be free

      type: tail -f composite_omit_map.out
      This will allow to see the progress of the processing in your terminal
      Doing this has allowed me to quickly see if my inputs have generate an error

        Vulnerable

        3 February 2010

        Artem comments:
        late graduate students and Postdocs are vulnerable…
        the challenge is to stick out from the background of young researchers…

        Vulnerable in the sense of being attacked
        The logical response is to defend, but be careful how you do so

        The reflex is to follow protocol, keep your head down and get a paper published. What other options do you have? You aren’t in charge, it’s not your lab.

        Getting ready to move on, you search for job openings, ask your boss who they know, polish the CV and get ready for interviews.

        The job opening appears and 300 people apply. A mountain of applications, all saying the same thing.

        Maybe the riskiest thing you can do, is not take any risks at all.

        This is the part of the post where you want 10 things to try
        This is the part of the post where we list what is remarkable
        This is the part where I don’t tell you what you are capable of

           | Posted by Sean | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: , |

          Tattoos

          1 February 2010

          Just found out some scientists like tattoos.

          Our contribution:

          1) hkl (on the appropriate knuckles)
          cns_generate
          2) Bragg’s Law (arm)
          3) Diffraction pattern (full back)

          Send in pictures of your crystallography tattoos for bonus points.