<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microlytic: Crystal Former and SmartScreen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/</link>
	<description>Macromolecular Crystallography there is an Easier Way</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:05:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morten Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.P212121.com/?p=1458#comment-310</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;Collecting&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; 

You are absolutely correct in mentioning that the capillaries are 100 microns by 150 microns. If the capillaries become much larger, convective phenomena begin to dominate, which we aim to avoid. 

In general crystals grown within the Crystal Former channels are up to 100 microns in size. Fortunately such crystals are large enough to give good diffraction data at most beam lines that are not optimized for microcrystals (such as the X6A at Brookhaven). In fact Vivian Stojanoff, Jean Jakoncic and myself were able to collect full datasets from individual crystals obtained in the initial screening of some of the model proteins we studied. The resolution of the refined structures ranged from 1.3 - 1.5 Angstrom.  

I would be happy to provide you with some preprints describing this work if you are interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="" title="Collecting" rel="nofollow"> </p>
<p>You are absolutely correct in mentioning that the capillaries are 100 microns by 150 microns. If the capillaries become much larger, convective phenomena begin to dominate, which we aim to avoid. </p>
<p>In general crystals grown within the Crystal Former channels are up to 100 microns in size. Fortunately such crystals are large enough to give good diffraction data at most beam lines that are not optimized for microcrystals (such as the X6A at Brookhaven). In fact Vivian Stojanoff, Jean Jakoncic and myself were able to collect full datasets from individual crystals obtained in the initial screening of some of the model proteins we studied. The resolution of the refined structures ranged from 1.3 &#8211; 1.5 Angstrom.  </p>
<p>I would be happy to provide you with some preprints describing this work if you are interested.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.P212121.com/?p=1458#comment-307</guid>
		<description>@DrJ:  Nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DrJ:  Nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrK</title>
		<link>http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>DrK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.P212121.com/?p=1458#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Maybe it would be with mentioning the capillaries are only 100x150um allowing crystals to only grow to the size of 50-75um. I doubt 6A is a good beamline for baby crystals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it would be with mentioning the capillaries are only 100&#215;150um allowing crystals to only grow to the size of 50-75um. I doubt 6A is a good beamline for baby crystals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrJ</title>
		<link>http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>DrJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.P212121.com/?p=1458#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Since your link is on their page, have you received anything in exchange?
The test screen for $500?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since your link is on their page, have you received anything in exchange?<br />
The test screen for $500?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kallelis</title>
		<link>http://www.P212121.com/2009/05/02/microlytic-crystalformer-and-smartscreen/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kallelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.P212121.com/?p=1458#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this guys and thanks for asking us all the questions.  Feel free to ask more.  We&#039;re glad to help.
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this guys and thanks for asking us all the questions.  Feel free to ask more.  We&#8217;re glad to help.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
